Commissioner of Stamps v Hope
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1891 |
| Date | 1891 |
| Year | 1891 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Financial Institutions Services Ltd v Negril Holdings et Al
...there is an express provision to the contrary. That appears from Price v. Moulton (1851) 10 CB 5561 as explained in Stamps Comr. V. Hope [1891] A.C. 476 But a running account with a bank stands on a different footing. When security is given for payment of amounts due or to become due on a r......
-
Financial Institutions Services Ltd v Negril Holdings and Negril Investment Company Ltd
...specialty unless there is an express provision to the contrary. That appears from Price v. Moulton (1851) 10 CB 5561 as explained in Stamps Comr. V. Hope [1891] A.C. 476 But a running account with a bank stands on a different footing. When security is given for payment of amounts due or to......
-
Kenmont Management Inc. v. Saint John Port Authority et al., 2002 NBCA 11
...the person of debtor.' That this is still the rule was decided in the House of Lords in the well known case of Com'r of Stamps v. Hope , [1891] A.C. 476 where an interesting passage from Wentworth on the Office of Executors ((1763), pp. 45, 47, 60(1)) was referred to and followed. (See also......
-
English, Scottish and Australian Bank Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...circumstances. A very useful statement of it is contained in the judgment prepared by Lord Field, of the Judicial Committee in Commissioners of Stamps v. Hope, 1891, A.C. 476, p. 481, and in a more recent case it is stated by Lord Cave who says the general principle is well settled ( Toron......
Request a trial to view additional results