Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Dowdall, O'Mahoney & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1950
Year1950
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Dowdall O'Mahoney & Company, Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 25 February 1952
    ...it. [Solicitors:-Solicitor of Inland Revenue; Last, Sons & Fitton for Crofton, Craven & Co.] 1 Reported 93 S.J. 774; 94 S.J. 335; [1950] 1 All E.R. 969; 96 S.J. 148; [1952] 1 All E.R. 531; [1952] A.C. 1 8 T.C. 20. 1 5 T.C., at p. 406. 1 12 T.C., at p. 236. 2 30 T.C., at p. 290. 1 Stevens v.......
  • 何華廣 訴 Chiu Hung Construction Co Ltd And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 14 November 2008
    ...17. 根據《香港民事程序2009》第1 冊22/5/5 段指出,當被告人向法庭繳存的款額多於原告人的判決金額時,除非有特別理由外,被告人應得繳存日期以後的訟費(見Findlay v Railway Executive [1950] 1 ALL ER 969 (CA); Miah, Mohammed Tara v Hyundai CCECC Joint Venture [2006] HKDC 18. 而《香港民事程序2009》第1 冊22/5/6 段亦指出,當被告人繳存的款額多於原告人的判決金額時,法庭可以就被告人所得的訟費與原告人所得的賠償及訟費對沖。 討論 19. 鍾法官......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT