Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Alexander von Glehn & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1919
Year1919
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
40 cases
  • Commissioner of Taxation v La Rosa
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Casey v Royal Cinemas (Limerick) Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 d6 Julho d6 1965
    ...1. (4) 1927 S. C. 705; 13 Tax Cas. 1. (5) 5 Tax Cas. 168. (6) 1924 S. C. 231; 8 Tax Cas. 671. (7) 1928 S. C. 738; 14 Tax Cas. 34. (8) [1920] 2 K. B. 553. (9) [1906] A. C. 448. (10) 1915 S. C. 91; 6 Tax Cas. 572. (11) [1901] 2 K. B. 349; 4 Tax Cas, 430. (12) [1942] I. R. 616. (13) 18 Tax Cas......
  • Dolan (Inspector of Taxes) v AB Co Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 11 d5 Março d5 1966
    ...AC 352. Bomford v Osborne [1942] AC 14. Bradbury v United Glass Bottle Manufacturers Ltd 38 TC 369. CIR v Alexander von Glehn & Co [1920] 2 KB 553. CIR v Cola 38 TC 334, [1959] SLT CIR v Granite City Steamship Co 1927 Sess Cas 705, 13 TC 1. CIR v Newcastle Breweries 12 TC 927, 95 LJ, KB 936......
  • McKnight (Inspector of Taxes) v Sheppard
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 d2 Maio d2 1996
    ...no sum shall be deducted in respect of (e) any loss not connected with or arising out of the trade, profession or vocation. 62. Warnes and Von Glehn establish that a civil penalty under an Act of Parliament is a loss within what is now s. 130(e). I can see no rational distinction between a ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Tax Relief For Victims of Fraud
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 4-4, February 1997
    • 1 d6 Fevereiro d6 1997
    ...Proprietary Gold Mines Ltd (1952) 33 TC 75. (18) Consider Fairrie v Hall (1947) 28 TC 200 (19) See IRC v Alexander von Glehn & Co. Ltd [1920] 2 KB 553, 12 TC 232. (20) Allen v Farquharson Brothers & Co., ref. 14 above. (21) Ceylon Commission of Inland Revenue v Appuhamy (1961) 41 ATC 317. (......