Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Alexander von Glehn & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1919
Date1919

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Casey v Royal Cinemas (Limerick) Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 July 1965
    ...1. (4) 1927 S. C. 705; 13 Tax Cas. 1. (5) 5 Tax Cas. 168. (6) 1924 S. C. 231; 8 Tax Cas. 671. (7) 1928 S. C. 738; 14 Tax Cas. 34. (8) [1920] 2 K. B. 553. (9) [1906] A. C. 448. (10) 1915 S. C. 91; 6 Tax Cas. 572. (11) [1901] 2 K. B. 349; 4 Tax Cas, 430. (12) [1942] I. R. 616. (13) 18 Tax Cas......
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Dowdall, O'Mahoney & Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 February 1952
    ...foreign or dominion taxes and reliance was placed upon the cases of Strong v. Woodifield [1906] A.C. 448, 5 Tax Ca. 215; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Von Glehn [1920] 2 K.B. 553, 12 Tax Ca. 232; Commissioners v. Warnes [1929] 2 K.B. 444. 12 Tax Ca. 227; L.C. Ltd. v. Ollivant [1944]......
  • Morgan v Tate & Lyle Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 June 1954
    ...Co. Ltd. v. Jones [1924] 8 T.C. 725); or as law-breaker ( Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Warnes & Co. [1919] 2 K.B.444; Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Von Glehn [1920] 2 K.B. 553). Here I would say that the expenditure was made by the company not as trader, but as owner of the trade, and ......
  • McKnight (Inspector of Taxes) v Sheppard
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 May 1996
    ...no sum shall be deducted in respect of (e) any loss not connected with or arising out of the trade, profession or vocation. 62. Warnes and Von Glehn establish that a civil penalty under an Act of Parliament is a loss within what is now s. 130(e). I can see no rational distinction between a ......
  • Get Started for Free