Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Korean Syndicate
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1920 |
Year | 1920 |
Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Westleigh Estates Company
...it, and had secured royalties to be paid to it by the lessees under a lease of the concession granted by it. Mr. Justice Rowlatt held, [1920] 1 K.B. 598, that the company was not carrying on business within Section 39 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1915. This decision was reversed by the Court......
-
The Commissioners of Inland Revenue v The Westleigh Estates Company, Ltd
...it, and had secured royalties to be paid to it by the lessees under a lease of the concession granted by it. Mr. Justice Rowlatt held, [1920] 1 K.B. 598, that the company was not carrying on business within Section 39 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1915. This decision was reversed by the Court......
-
Salisbury House Estate, Ltd v Fry (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...the parties. 12. The following cases, amongst others, were referred to:-Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Korean Syndicate Ltd.TAX(1), [1920] 1 K.B. 598Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Westleigh Estates Co., Ltd.TAX(2)Same v. South Behar Railway Co.TAX(3) [1923] 2 K.B. 514; [1925] A.C. 4......
- I Investment Ltd v Comptroller-General of Inland Revenue
Request a trial to view additional results