Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Korean Syndicate

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1920
Year1920
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Westleigh Estates Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 February 1925
    ...it, and had secured royalties to be paid to it by the lessees under a lease of the concession granted by it. Mr. Justice Rowlatt held, [1920] 1 K.B. 598, that the company was not carrying on business within Section 39 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1915. This decision was reversed by the Court......
  • The Commissioners of Inland Revenue v The Westleigh Estates Company, Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 19 February 1925
    ...it, and had secured royalties to be paid to it by the lessees under a lease of the concession granted by it. Mr. Justice Rowlatt held, [1920] 1 K.B. 598, that the company was not carrying on business within Section 39 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1915. This decision was reversed by the Court......
  • Salisbury House Estate, Ltd v Fry (HM Inspector of Taxes)
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 4 April 1930
    ...the parties. 12. The following cases, amongst others, were referred to:-Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Korean Syndicate Ltd.TAX(1), [1920] 1 K.B. 598Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Westleigh Estates Co., Ltd.TAX(2)Same v. South Behar Railway Co.TAX(3) [1923] 2 K.B. 514; [1925] A.C. 4......
  • I Investment Ltd v Comptroller-General of Inland Revenue
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT