Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Crossman (Ethel Maclean) and Others ; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Mann (Sir Edward) and Others

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Year1936
CourtHouse of Lords
Date1936
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
115 cases
  • Commissioner of Estate Duties, The; JS Anderson v; the Estate Duty Ordinance, s 36 and the estate of Wynfreda Jeannie Dunbar Hogg, deceased
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Alexander v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 January 1991
    ...The following cases were referred to in the judgments: Buccleuch (Duke of) v IR Commrs ELR[1967] 1 AC 506 IR Commrs v Crossman & Ors ELR[1937] AC 26 Lynall & Anor v IR Commrs ELR[1972] AC 680 Winter & Ors (Executors of Sir Arthur Munro Sutherland) v IR Commrs ELR[1963] AC 235 Capital transf......
  • Re Lynall, decd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 October 1971
    ...not want them they were only transferable to a purchaser accepted by the Directors. 6 A similar situation occurred in C.I.R. v. Crossman [1937] A.C. 26. The Appellants asked us to reconsider that decision. I have done so and I agree with the decision of the majority in this House. They foll......
  • Re Lynall, decd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 July 1969
    ...strong Court of Appeal in Ireland, which was followed and confirmed in the House of Lords in Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Crossman (1937 Appeal Cases 26), that the meaning to be given to this section is that for the purpose of estimating the price of such shares, price being under the se......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The investor as a member of a company : a reflection on misused concept
    • South Africa
    • Lesotho Law Journal No. 20-1_2, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...tions (Yaba-Nigeria: Datakonsult Ltd, 1992) at 12. 38 [1901] 1 Ch 279 at 288(ChD). See also Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Crossman [1937] AC 26 at 66 (HL) per Lord Russel of Killowen; Bradbury v English Sewing Cotton Co Ltd [1923 ] AC 744 (HL) at 746 per Lord Wrenbury; Cooper v Boyes 199......
  • Legal aspects of share watering: A comparative study
    • South Africa
    • Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 30 May 2019
    ...aspects of payment f or 1 Borland Trustees v Steel Brothers and Co [1901] 1 Ch 279; See also Re Paulin [1935] 1 KB 26; IRC v Crossman [1937] AC 26. 2 See Sutton's Hospital (1612) 10 Co Rep 1; Tillard v Brown (1668) 1 Lev 237; Salmon v Hamborough Company (1671) 1 Ch Cas 204 HL. 3 London Sack......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT