Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Sneath

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1932
Date1932

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
54 cases
  • The State (Whelan) v Smidic
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 7 April 1938
    ...& 149, FA 1929 (No 32 of 1929) s 5, ITA 1967 s 416. Cases referred to in judgment Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Sneath 17 TC 149, [1932] 2 KB 362. Fry v Burma Corporation Ltd 15 TC 113, [1930] 1 KB 249, [1930] AC MacLaine and Company v Eccott [1926] AC 424, 10 TC 481. Rex v Special Comm......
  • Re Sarjit Singh Khaira
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1990
  • Ranaweera v Ramachandran
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ...judicial qualities were called for in its performance. Dicta of Greer L.J. and Romer L.J. inInland Revenue Commissioners v. Sneath [1932] 2 K.B. 362, 385, 390, C.A. approved. Dictum of Megarry J. in Slaney v. Kean[1970] Ch. 243, 251; [1969] 3 W.L.R. 240; [1970] 1 All E.R. 434 doubted. (2) (......
  • Chien Hon Keong; Wong Sai Tack
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2000
  • Get Started for Free