Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Sneath

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1932
Year1932
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
66 cases
  • The State (Whelan) v Smidic
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 7 April 1938
    ...& 149, FA 1929 (No 32 of 1929) s 5, ITA 1967 s 416. Cases referred to in judgment Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Sneath 17 TC 149, [1932] 2 KB 362. Fry v Burma Corporation Ltd 15 TC 113, [1930] 1 KB 249, [1930] AC MacLaine and Company v Eccott [1926] AC 424, 10 TC 481. Rex v Special Comm......
  • Re Sarjit Singh Khaira
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1990
  • Ranaweera v Ramachandran
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ...judicial qualities were called for in its performance. Dicta of Greer L.J. and Romer L.J. inInland Revenue Commissioners v. Sneath [1932] 2 K.B. 362, 385, 390, C.A. approved. Dictum of Megarry J. in Slaney v. Kean[1970] Ch. 243, 251; [1969] 3 W.L.R. 240; [1970] 1 All E.R. 434 doubted. (2) (......
  • Chien Hon Keong; Wong Sai Tack
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2000
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT