La Compania Martiatu v Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Judgment Date | 24 November 1922 |
| Date | 24 November 1922 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
28 cases
- Tuong Aik (Sarawak) Sdn Bhd v Arab-Malaysian Eagle Assurance Bhd
- Freighter Kien Kung, The
-
Mccann v Switzerland Insuranceaustralia Ltd
...CLR 378 at 398 per Brennan J, 441 per McHugh J and Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316 at 403 [221] per Callinan J. 121La Compania Martiartu v Royal Exchange Assurance [1923] 1 KB 650 at 657 per Scrutton 122Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232 at 239 [10] per Gaudron J. 123Fitzgerald v Penn ......
-
Howmet Ltd v Economy Devices Ltd and Others
...which lay upon them. This second matter appears clearly from certain observations of Scrutton L.J. in La Compania Martiartu v. Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation [1923] 1 K.B. 650. That was a case in which the Court of Appeal, reversing the trial judge, found that the ship in respect of w......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
THE CESSATION OF SUE AND LABOUR
...Ibid, at 534. 26 Supra n 17. 27 Supra n 11. 28 Ibid, at [54]. 29 La Compañia Martiartu v The Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance [1923] 1 KB 650 (evidence of scuttling). 30 There is no case law yet that applies s 58 to a hijacked ship. It was originally meant for a ship that went mi......