Company (No. 0012209 of 1991), Re A

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1992
Year1992
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
90 cases
  • Re a company (No 00751 of 1992)ex parte Avocet Aviation Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Quarry Prods Ltd v Austin Intl Inc.
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 5 July 2000
    ...[1980] Q.B. 137; [1979] 2 All E.R. 1063, applied. (4) CITV-33, In re, 1992–93 CILR 332. (5) Company (No. 0012209 of 1991), In re a, [1992] 1 W.L.R. 351; [1992] 2 All E.R. 797, dicta of Hoffmann J. applied. (6) Company (No. 0013734 of 1991), Re a, [1992] 2 Lloyd”s Rep. 415; [1993] BCLC 59. (......
  • Angel Group Ltd v British Gas Trading Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 October 2012
    ...bring the indisputable part below £750): c) A dispute will not be "substantial" if it has really no rational prospect of success: in Re A Company No.0012209 [1992] 1WLR 351 at 354B. d) A dispute will not be put forward in good faith if the company is merely seeking to take for itself credit......
  • Harada Ltd and Another v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • ChD (Companies & bankruptcy)
    • 29 November 2013
    ...good faith grounds in relation to the whole of the debt. That test itself is discussed and applied in numerous cases, including Re a Company (No 0012209 of 1991) [1992] 1 WLR 351, which was one of the authorities cited on behalf of the applicants. 17 I find that the applicants have not esta......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • WINDING UP PETITIONS FOUNDED ON A BONA FIDE DISPUTED DEBT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1998, December 1998
    • 1 December 1998
    ...supra, note 9, at 541G—H and 546B. 43 Supra, note 15, at 574i—575h. 44 Supra, note 15, at 579c—f. 45 Re a Company (No 0012209 of 1991) [1992] 1 WLR 351; McDonald’s Restaurants Ltd v Urbandivide Co Ltd[1994] 1 BCLC 306 at 316g—317e. See also G B White Pty Ltd v Taylor Railtrack Pty Ltd[1978]......
  • Insolvency Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...process and a high-risk strategy which may attract an order of indemnity costs against the petitioner (Re A Company (No 0012209 of 1991)[1992] 1 WLR 351 at 354; Re a company (No 00751 of 1992), ex parteAvocet Aviation Ltd[1992] BCLC 869 at 871). Evidence of insolvency 14.13 In Re Dayang Con......