Company v Company (Ancillary Relief: Pre-Marriage Cohabitation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWHC 287 (Fam) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
IX v IY
...631. Charman v Charman(no 4)[2007] EWCA Civ 503, [2007] 2 FCR 217, [2007] 1 FLR 1246, [2007] WTLR 1151, (2006–07) 9 ITELR 913. CO v CO[2004] EWHC 287 (Fam), [2004] 1 FLR Duxbury v Duxbury [1992] Fam 62, [1991] 3 WLR 639, [1990] 2 All ER 77, [1987] 1 FLR 7. GW v RW[2003] EWHC 611 (Fam), [200......
-
C v C
...adopt. In respect of the potential significance of a pre-marital relationship, I have been referred, among others, to the decisions of: (a) CO v. CO [2004] 1 F.L.R. 1095, in which Coleridge J. referred to periods of: “Committed, settled relationships … in the context of cohabitation” as “c......
-
Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
...Payments) [2003] EWHC 611 (Fam), [2004] 1 FCR 709; and CO v CO (Ancillary Relief: Pre-marriage Cohabitation) [2004] EWHC 287 (Fam), [2004] 1FLR 1095 at [39] to [48]. There is not a case in the calendar where a court has expressly taken into account (whether while assessing the impact of the......
-
Y v McG
...Relief: Periodical Payments) [2003] EWHC 611 (Fam), [2004] 1 FCR 709; and CO v CO (Ancillary Relief: Pre-marriage Cohabitation) [2004] EWHC 287 (Fam), [2004] 1FLR 1095. Singer J then concluded : “There is not a case in the calendar where a court has expressly taken into account (whether whi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Financial Remedies
...take conduct into account, except in ‘the most obvious and gross cases’. 78 67 Co v Co (Ancillary Relief – Pre-marriage Cohabitation) [2004] EWHC 287 (Fam), [2004] 1 FLR 1095; M v M (Financial Relief – Substantial Earning Capacity) [2004] EWHC 688 (Fam), [2004] 2 FLR 236. 68 GW v RW (Financ......