Conway v Petronius Clothing Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1978 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
52 cases
-
Oxford Legal Group Ltd v Sibbasbridge Services Plc
...12 The judge reminded himself (at paragraph [33] of his judgment) of the principles which, as Mr Justice Slade held in Conway v Petronius Clothing Co Ltd and others [1977] 1 WLR 72, 89G-91A, should govern the approach of a court when deciding whether to order that books and records of a com......
-
Wuu Khek Chiang George v ECRC Land Pte Ltd
...sought for an ulterior purpose inimical to the interests of the company. He referred to Conway & Ors v Petronius Clothing Co Ltd & Ors [1978] 1 All ER 185[1978] 1 WLR 72, State of South Australia v Barrett [1995] 13 ACLC 1369, Haw Par Brothers (Pte) Ltd v Dato Aw Kow [1972-1974] SLR 183 [19......
- Datuk Beh Kim Ling and Another v NEP Holdings (Malaysia) Berhad
- Mcgee v Sanders
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Duties
...the 18 Oxford Legal Group Limited v Sibbasbridge Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 387 at [24]. 19 Conway v Petronius Clothing Limited [1978] 1 WLR 72 at 90E. 20 Campbell v Campbell [2017] EWHC 182 (Ch). Duties 65 partnership, or from any use by him of the partnership property, name or business ......
-
Table of Cases
...All ER (D) 132 209 Const v Harris (1824) Turn & R 496, 37 ER 1191, [1824–34] All ER Rep 311 59, 139 Conway v Petronius Clothing Ltd [1978] 1 WLR 72, [1978] 1 All ER 185, 122 Sol Jo 15, ChD 64 Coolgardie Goldfields Ltd, Re [1900] 1 Ch 475, 69 LJ Ch 215, 82 LT 23, ChD 91 Cooke (Inspector of T......
-
A DIRECTOR’S STATUTORY RIGHTS OF INSPECTION OF ACCOUNTS
...decision reached in the recent case of Credit Development Pte Ltd v IMO Pte Ltd[1993] 2 SLR 370. 16 Cap 50. 17 (1890) 7 TLR 118. 18 [1978] 1 WLR 72, [1978] 1 AER 185. 19 If the financial statements prepared do not show a true and fair view, then the directors will face criminal liabilities.......