Cooden Engineering Company Ltd v Stanford
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1952 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
50 cases
-
Campbell Discount Company Ltd v Bridge
...that the sum claimed under clause 9 is damages for his own breach. He relied on ( Cooden Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Stanford 053 volume 1 Queen's Bench Division, page 86, as establishing that the sum could be and is a penalty on the facts of the present case. But in my judgment that argument i......
-
Alder v Moore
...there anything unconscionable or unjust and therefore unenforceable to be found. 20 In ( Cooden Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Stanford 1953 1 Queen's Bench, page 86) this court by a majority took a different view and considered whether, applying the principles laid down in Lord Dunedin's speech i......
-
Yeoman Credit Ltd v Waragowski
...Court of tho Queen's Bench Division which is referred to in a Judgment of Lord Justice Jenkins in tho case of The Cooden Engineering Company Limited v. Stanford, reported in (1953) 1 Queen's Bench, page 80, at page 99. But I am bound to say, speaking for myself, that, as is apparent if one ......
-
The Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National Plc and 7 Others
... ... told, nine of the twelve members of the Cheque and Credit Clearing Company, and all operate large numbers of personal current accounts. Clydesdale, ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Hire purchase and consumer protection adjudication in caricom courts
...was therefore liable to pay the $213. 149 (1961) 4 W.I.R. 37, 38-39. 150 [1960] L.R.B.G. 218. 151 See Zeigel, [1964] C.L.J. 108. 152 [1952] 2 All E.R. 915. 153 [1952] 2 All E.R. 915. (v) The Right to Repossess (a) Burrowes v. John Mohammed 154 This was a decision of George J. in the High Co......
Request a trial to view additional results