Cool Carriers AB v HSBC Bank USA
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 2001 |
Date | 2001 |
Year | 2001 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Arcelormittal USA LLC (a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware) v Essar Steel Ltd (a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius)
...recognised under RSC Order 11 in Mercedes Benz A.G. v Leiduck [1996] 1 AC 284 continues to apply to CPR 6BPD 3.1(2), see Cool Carriers A.B v HSBC Bank USA [2001] 2 Lloyd's Rep 22. 37 Thus I consider that the court has jurisdiction to grant a worldwide freezing order, and has a discretion a......
-
Eastern European Engineering Ltd v Vijay Construction (Proprietary) Ltd
...recognised under RSC Order 11 in Mercedes Benz A.G. v Leiduck [1996] 1 AC 284 continues to apply to CPR 6BPD 3.1(2), see Cool Carriers A.B v HSBC Bank USA [2001] 2 Lloyd's Rep 37 Thus I consider that the court has jurisdiction to grant a worldwide freezing order, and has a discretion as to......
-
Stephenson Harwood LLP v Medien Patentverwaltung AG
...to the stating of an issue or issues between the claimants themselves (hence ‘interpleader’).” 36 Tomlinson J in Cool Carriers AB and another v HSBC Bank USA and others [2001] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 22 described the claim as follows: “…a claim to interpleader relief invokes two or more claims brou......