Cooper v Cooper
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 24 February 1888 |
| Date | 24 February 1888 |
| Docket Number | No. 3. |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
39 cases
-
Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland) v Livingston
... ... Attorney-General [ 1940 ] A.C. 350 ; 55 T.L.R. 1025 ; [ 1939 ] 3 All E.R. 787 , H.L.(E.) ... Cooper v. Cooper ( 1874 ) L.R. 7 H.L. 53 could not be recognised today as containing an authoritative statement of the rights of next-of-kin or ... ...
-
Re Dicey, deceased ; Julian v Dicey
...precise point now raised has been determined. It becomes accordingly necessary to consider the true character of the rule. The case of Cooper v. Cooper in the House of Lords ( Volume 7, English and Irish Appeal Cases, page 53) concerned a testatrix upon whom had been conferred a limited pow......
-
Tevlin v Gilseman
... ... [The following cases were cited: Hamill v. Murphy ( 2 ); Carolan and Scott's Contract ( 3 ); Tench v. Glennon ( 4 ); Cooper v. Cooper ( 5 ); Holland v. Chambers ( 6 ); Gormley v. Buchanan ( 7 ) Sweeney v. Gallagher ( 8 ); Turner v. Rennoldson ( 9 ); Mullane v ... ...
-
The High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v Prince Mukarram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad
...117 Haugesund Kommune v. Depfa ACS Bank, [2010] EWCA Civ 579 at [38]. 118 [2010] EWCA Civ 579. 119 At [47]. 120 At [27]–[28]. 121 (1888) 13 App Cas 88 at 122 Collins (ed), Dicey, Morris & Collins: The Conflict of Laws, 15 th ed (2012) ( Dicey & Morris) at [32–172]. 123 Dicey & Morris at [......
Request a trial to view additional results