Copeland v Craddock
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
Re Belfield Furnishings Ltd; Isaacs and another v Belfield Furnishings Ltd and Others
...and only in plain and obvious cases. 6 Mr Downes who appeared with Ms Lee for the Petitioners reminded me that in Copeland v Craddock [1997] BCC 294—a case that concerned a petition seeking relief under s.459 and a just and equitable winding up in the alternative — Bingham LJ had this to sa......
-
Hawkes v Cuddy and Others (Nos 1 & 2)
...deputy judge referred to what Bingham LJ had to say about the jurisdiction to strike-out a section 459 petition in Copeland v Craddock [1997] BCC 294 at 300, and concluded that it was not enough that the claim is unlikely to succeed or that the petition is thin. The deputy judge held that: ......
-
Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd v The Hut Group Ltd & Others
...that the power of court to strike out a petition should be exercised only in a plain and obvious case. In Re Copeland & Craddock Ltd [1997] BCC 294, this court refused to strike out a winding-up order as a possible remedy in a shareholder's petition. Although Bingham LJ thought that it was ......
-
Lagan Holdings Ltd, Lagan Cement Group Ltd, Lagan Developments (Holdings) Ltd and Kingscourt Bricks Ltd v Lagan Homes Ltd
...be "perfectly clear that the claim which is to be struck out cannot succeed": per Dillon LJ in Copeland –v- Copeland and Craddock Limited [1997] BCC 294, [Lexis transcript, p. 4]. In the same case, Bingham LJ stated, in uncompromising language [Lexis transcript, p. 6]: "It has been often an......
Request a trial to view additional results