Copeland v Wattss and Another, Executors of Gubbins
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 04 December 1815 |
| Date | 04 December 1815 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 171 E.R. 412
IN THE COMMON PLEAS
Copeland
and
Wattss and Another, Executors of Gubbins
[95] in the common pleas December 4, 1815 copeland v. wattss and another, executors of gubbins (A solicitor to a third person, is bound to produce his client's lease, executed by the defendant, provided the production will not operate to the prejudice of his client. But if the reading of such a document would operate to the prejudice of a third person, the Court will [not] direct it to be read An acceptance of a surrender of a lease is not to be presumed from the circumstance of the rent having been paid, not by the original tenant, but by a third person.) Action by the lessor on covenants in the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
...3 All E.R. 132, referred to. (9) Calcraft v. Guest, [1898] 1 Q.B. 759; (1898), 78 L.T. 283, not followed. (10) Copeland v. WattsENR(1815), 1 Stark. 95; 171 E.R. 412, referred to. (11) Corsen v. DuboisENR(1816), Holt. 239; 171 E.R. 228, referred to. (12) Derby & Co. Ltd. v. Weldon (No. 8), [......
- Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin and Others
-
Burn v Phelps
...] English Reports Citation: 171 E.R. 412 IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS Burn and Phelps 412 BURN V. PHELPS 1 STABS. 94171 E.R. 412 IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON 412 BURN V. PHELPS 1 STABS. 94. [94] burn v. phelps. (A. lets lands to B., who under-lets to C and others......
-
Parkhurst v Lowten
...10 Mod. 40. Rex v. Watkinson, 2 Str. 1122. (Jobden v. Kendrick, 4 T. .R. 431. Bishop of Winchester v. Fournier, 2 Ves. iSW. 445. Copeland v. Waifa, 1 Stark. 95. (7) It seems that the privilege prevails although the client is not a party to the suit. Sloman v. Herne, 2 Esp. 695. .Rea; v. Wit......