Cornick v Cornick (No 3)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Pearce v Pearce
...judge's uplift of the Duxbury capitalisation was legitimate following the decision of Charles J in the case of Cornick v Cornick(No 3) [2001] 2 FLR 1240. She submitted that junior counsel at the trial had agreed that the judge should direct himself on that authority. She also contended tha......
-
Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
...standard." 98 In so deciding the court endorsed and followed the earlier decision in Boylan v. Boylan [1988] 1 FLR 282. In Cornick No.3 [2001] 2 FLR 1240 Charles J stated in paragraph 106 of his judgment: - '[106] In my judgment, just as it is on the first application for orders for financ......
-
McFarlane v McFarlane ; Parlour v Parlour
...FCR 97, [2002] 1 WLR 1441, [2002] 1 FLR 207. Cornick v Cornick (No 2) [1996] 1 FCR 179, [1995] 2 FLR 490, CA. Cornick v Cornick (No 3) [2001] 2 FLR 1240. de Lasala v de Lasala [1979] 2 All ER 1146, [1980] AC 546, [1979] 3 WLR 390, Doherty v Doherty [1975] 2 All ER 635, [1976] Fam 71, [1975]......
-
Lauder v Lauder
...later concept has now been tempered by the House of Lords decisions in White and Miller v McFarlane. In the case of Cornick (Number 3) [2001] 2FLR 1240 Charles J dealt with cases on the variation of periodical payments which has been made before White was decided. In particular I note what ......
Request a trial to view additional results