Corporation'n of the Royal Exchange Assurance v The Kingsley Navigation Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 23 January 1923 |
| Date | 23 January 1923 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
- Beazley Underwriting Ltd v Travelers Companies Inc.
-
Scott v Copenhagen Reinsurance Company (UK) Ltd
...aircraft arose out of one "event". "Arising out of" may perhaps mean no more than "proximately caused by": see Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. Kingsley Navigation (1923) A.C. 235, but I think that in the present context it is probably wider, because the Clauses envisage that ......
-
Standard Oil Company of New York v Clan Line Steamers
...[1909] A. C. 450; Steel v. State Line Steamship Co.ELR, (1877) 3 App. Cas. 72. 3 Royal Exchange Assurance v. Kingsley Navigation Co.ELR, [1923] A. C. 235. 1 Tait v. LeviENR, 14 East, 480; Moore v. LunnUNK, (1922) 38 T. L. R. 649; ‘Gunford’ Ship Co. v. Thames and Mersey Marine Insurance Co.,......
-
Scott v Copenhagen Reinsurance Company (UK) Ltd [QBD (Comm)]
...out of may perhaps mean no more than proximately caused by: see Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v Kingsley NavigationELR[1923] AC 235, but I think that in the present context it is probably wider, because the Clauses envisage that one event may cause a plurality of loss and/or d......
Request a trial to view additional results