Corporation of Bacup v Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1889 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Hackett v Smith
...therefore, there had been no service upon the owner of the notice prescribed by sect. 110 of the Act. Corporation of Bacup v. Smith, 44 Ch. D. 395, followed. Held, also, by Campbell C.J. and Madden J., that the works were done voluntarily, and not under compulsion of the statute, and that t......
-
Guarantee Co. of North America v. Beasse et al., (1991) 150 A.R. 241 (QB)
...interested at the suit of whom or one of whom he has been appointed [ Bacup Corpn. v. Smith (1804), 9 Ves. 335; Bacup Corpn v. Smith (1890), 44 Ch. D. 395; 59 L.J. Ch. 518, C.A.]." [57] See also, in support of these statements and of similar effect, the following further authorities cited b......
-
Empire Capital Partners Pty Ltd v CMB Investments 1993 Pty Ltd
...court and is not subject to the directions of or control by persons at whose instigation he was appointed: Corporation of Bacup v Smith (1890) 44 Ch D 395 per Chitty, J, at p. 398; Burt, Boulton and Hayward v Bull, [1895] 1 QB 276 per Esher, MR, at p. 279 and Rigby, LJ, at p. 284; and Boehm......
-
Lordly Trading Company Ltd et Al v Cunningham Nee Curry et Al
... ... 15 A receiver appointed by the court not an agent for any of the parties: Corporation of Bacup v. Smith (1890) 44 Ch. D. 395. The learned author of “Snell's Equity” 13th ed. at page ... ...
2 books & journal articles
-
The Foundations of Receivership Law
...insolvency proceedings, nothing further will be said about these other types of court-appointed receivers. 3 Bacup Corporation v Smith (1890), 44 Ch D 395; Parsons v Sovereign Bank of Canada , [1913] AC 130 (PC). 4 The historical development of the privately appointed receiver is described ......
-
The Foundations of Receivership Law
...proceedings, nothing further will be said about these other types of court-appointed receivers. 2 Bacup Corporation v. Smith (1890), 44 Ch. D. 395; Parsons v. Sovereign Bank of Canada , [1913] A.C. 130 (P.C.). 3 The historical development of the privatly appointed receiver is described in G......