Corrigendum to “A Patchwork of Intra-Schengen Policing: Border Games over National Identity and National Sovereignty”
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221131464 |
| Published date | 01 May 2023 |
| Date | 01 May 2023 |
| Subject Matter | Corrigendum |
Corrigendum to “A Patchwork
of Intra-Schengen Policing:
Border Games over National
Identity and National
Sovereignty”
Van der Woude, M. (2020) ‘A Patchwork of Intra-Schengen Policing: Border Games
over National Identity and National Sovereignty’,Theoretical Criminology, 24(1),
pp. 110–131. doi: 10.1177/1362480619871615.
In the above-referenced paper, the author wishes to correctly reference Moffette,
D. (2020) ‘The jurisdictional games of immigration policing: Barcelona’sfight against
unauthorized street vending’,Theoretical Criminology, 24(2), pp. 258–275. doi: 10.
1177/1362480618811693.
Page 113, section “Lens 2: Jurisdictional games and interlegality”should be shown as
below:
Lens 2: Jurisdictional games & interlegality
In his 2020 article, Moffette –building upon the work of Valverde (2009, 2010) and De
Sousa Santos (1987) –introduces the multi-scalared nature of governance structure as a
lens to analyse how government actors responsible for migration and border control can,
and are, using this structure to their advantage by shifting from one jurisdictional scale to
the other –depending on what is most beneficial for them. In this approach, which
acknowledges the pluralist nature of legal norms and systems, the notion of jurisdiction
is to be understood in a dynamic way and as a power that sits with anyone –whether they
are a formal state actor or not –who, “(…) wants to summon or enforce the law, make
claims about the “where”, the “who”, the “what”, the “when”, and the “how”of law
(Valverde, 2009) and provide rationales for why an act or a person, in a particular
place, falls under the authority of a particular body and should be treated according to
this or that kind of procedures.”(Moffette & Pratt 2020: 16). Looking at jurisdiction
this way, addresses the performative aspect of jurisdictions. A similar performative
quality has also been attributed to borders through the act(s) of bordering (also see
Ford 1999 and Wonders 2006). The performance of jurisdictions is, or can be, at the
same time, part of this performative act of bordering as the allocation of jurisdiction
Corrigendum
Theoretical Criminology
2023, Vol. 27(2) 348–349
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/13624806221131464
journals.sagepub.com/home/tcr
To continue reading
Request your trial