Cotton v Sawyer
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Exchequer |
| Judgment Date | 11 June 1842 |
| Date | 11 June 1842 |
English Reports Citation: 152 E.R. 496
EXCH. OF PLEAS.
Cotton
and
Sawyer
S. C. 2 Dowl. (N. S.) 310; 11 L. J. Ex. 397.
496 COTTON V. SAWYER 10M. SW. 329. cotton v. SAWYER. Exch. of Pleas. June 11, 1842.-Where a. defendant was described in a writ of summons as " R. S., of the city of London"--Held, that the description was insufficient, although it was stated in the affidavits that sometime before the issuing of the writ he had abandoned his house, and had no regular place of abode.-Semble, that he ought to have been described as of his late abode. [S. C. 2 Dowl. (N. S.) 310; 11 L. J. Ex. 397.] Hoggins had obtained a rule calling upon...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Thompson v Nicholas
...does not render it a nullity, so as to entitle the defendant to sign judgment of non pros. [S. C. 2 Dowl. (N. S.) 226; 11 L. J. Ex. 384152 E.R. 496 EXCH. OF PLEAS. Thompson and Nicholas S. C. 2 Dowl. (N. S.) 226; 11 L. J. Ex. 384. £330] thompson v. nicholas. Exch. of Pleas. June 11, 1842.-A......
-
Kelly v Lawrence and Another
...that it can be true, the omission or insufficiency of the description would be ground for setting aside writ and service ; Cotton v. Sawyer, 10 M & W 328 , Windham v Fenmck, 11 M & W 102 , King v. Hopkins, 13 M, & W 685 , and a party named, but not even served, m the latter case, was he......
-
Thorpe v Browne
...BROWNE. Rolls. Trousdale v. SheppardIR 14 Ir. Com. Law Rep. 370. In re Fitzgerald's EstateUNK 11 Ir. Ch. Rep. 278. Cotton v. SawyerENR 10 M. & W. 328. In re Fitzgerald's EstateUNK 11 Ir. Ch. Rep. 284. M'Dowell v. WheatleyIR 7 Ir. Com. Law Rep. 512. Woodroffe v. GreenUNK 12 Ir. Ch. Rep. 481.......
