Council of the Municipality of Brisbane v Martin
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1894 |
| Year | 1894 |
| Date | 1894 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
M'Inerney v The "Clareman" Printing and Publishing Company
...7 A. C. 741. Commissioners for Railways v. Brown 13 A. C. 133. Coulson v. CoulsonUNK 3 T. L. R. 846. Council of Brisbane v. MartinELR [1894] A. C. 249. Fisher v. RooneyIR [1901] 2 I. R. 465. Fisher v. The Nation NewspaperIR [1901] 2 I. R. at p. 470. Goldstein v. FossENR 6 B. & C. 154. Grant......
-
Rex v Slabbert and Prinsloo
...Brown v Commissioner for Railways (15 A.C. at p. 250); Jones v Spencer (77 L.T at p. 538); Council of Municipality of Brisbane v Martin (1894, A.C. 249); Hulton v Hulton. (1917, 1. K.B. at pp. 822, 825) ). In Rex v McNair (25 T.L.R. 228), however, it was held that the Court of Appeal will n......
-
Norwich Union Life Insurance Society v Dobbs (3)
...(25 S.C.R. 180), Hunter v Cape Town Tramways (17 S.C.R. 80), Bang v Natal Lloyds (28 N.L.R. 344), Brisbane Municipality v Martin (1894, A.C. 249), Commissioner of Railways v Brown (13 A.C. 133). The appellant must show that no reasonable man could have arrived at the verdict given by the ju......
-
Rex v Slabbert and Prinsloo
...Brown v Commissioner for Railways (15 A.C. at p. 250); Jones v Spencer (77 L.T at p. 538); Council of Municipality of Brisbane v Martin (1894, A.C. 249); Hulton v Hulton. (1917, 1. K.B. at pp. 822, 825) ). In Rex v McNair (25 T.L.R. 228), however, it was held that the Court of Appeal will n......