Couser v Couser

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date27 February 1996
Date27 February 1996
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Chai Choon Yong v Central Provident Fund Board and Others
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 28 March 2005
    ...fraud. This is also the stated purpose behind the formalities for wills (In re Colling, decd [1972] 1 WLR 1440 and Couser v Couser [1996] 1 WLR 1301 at 1303–1305). To ensure that the signature is truly that of the CPF member’s, the act of signing must be seen by others. The presence of two ......
  • Stovin and Another v Norfolk County Council
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 July 1996
  • Sangha v Sangha
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 August 2022
    ...may properly be regarded as an acknowledgement of his signature. There is no particular formality required for an acknowledgement — in Couser v Couser [1996] 1 W.L.R. 1301, the relevant witness acknowledged her signature to the testator after he had acknowledged it to her and her husband (......
  • Caroline Burdine Coakley v Merilyn Deshanks
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 3 February 2023
    ...Theresa Woodside the Executrix of the Late Bernard Woodside v Woodside [2014] 1 BHS J No. 71 where Barnett CJ (as he then was) relied on Couser v Courser [1996] 1 WLR 1301 which stated:- “Section 9 of the Act of 1837 is clearly, as now slightly redrawn by the substitution of the section, d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 August 2022
    ...(D) 10/9 149, 151 Cook’s Estate, Re; Murison v Cook [1960] 1 All ER 689, [1960] 1 WLR 353, 104 Sol Jo 311, PD&A 27 Couser v Couser [1996] 3 All ER 256, [1996] 1 WLR 1301, [1996] 3 FCR 745, ChD 32–33 Couwenbergh v Valkova [2008] EWHC 2451 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 264 (Oct) 44 Cowan v Foreman ......
  • Execution of a Will
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 August 2022
    ...of the document that they were being asked to sign and signed. This provision can lead to confusion, as illustrated in Couser v Couser [1996] 1 WLR 1301, where the testator drafted his will and signed it. He then took it to his friends (a couple) for attestation. When he arrived at their ho......
  • Requirements for Valid Execution
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Wills A Practical Guide - 2nd Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...at execution but is included in section 9 to save a will which might otherwise have been invalidly executed. In Couser v Couser [1996] 3 All ER 256, the testator, T, completed and signed a printed will form. He took it to his friends, Mr and Mrs B, for witnessing. Mrs B signed the will, alt......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT