Cox v Bent and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 10 November 1828 |
| Date | 10 November 1828 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 130 E.R. 1031
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, AND OTHER COURTS
Cox
and
Bent and Others
S. C. 2 Moo. & P. 281; 7 L. J. C. P. (O. S.) 68.
[185] Cox v. bent and others. Nov. 10,1828. [S. C. 2 Moo. & P. 281; 7 L. J. C. P. (0. S.) 68.] Plaintiff, who had entered on premises under an agreement for a lease, admitted a charge of half a year's rent in an account between him and his landlord:-Held, that this constituted him a tenant from year to year, and liable to distress. Eeplevin for taking the Plaintiffs goods in a place called the Newcastle Brewery. Avowry, that the Plaintiff for a year ending March 25, 1827, held the Newcastle Brewery as tenant to the Defendants, by virtue of a demise thereof to him, at the...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Vincent v Godson
...v. Benett (3 Bing. 361) ; and accounting for rent, or admitting it to be due, as in this case, is equivalent to payment, Cox v. Bent (5 Bing. 185). The principle which limits the right to distrain for rent to the particular subject of demise does not apply in cases like the present, when th......
-
Lessee Delap v Leonard
...Bat. 80. Lessee Faussett V. Hall Al. & N. 248. Pluck V. Digges 5 Bli. P. C. N. S. 41. Lessee Denny V. O'Connell 1 Longf. & T. 629. BentENR 5 Bing. 185. Knight V. BennettENR 3 Bing. 361. Rawlins'caseUNK 4 Rep. 52. Jackson V. Jackson 2 Law Rec. N. S. 36, and n. Eyston V. Studel Plowd. 465. Do......
-
Fahy v O'Donnell
...The Chief Justice was present at only part of the argument. FAHY and O'DONNELL Brathwayte v. HitchcockENR 10 M. & W. 494. Cox v. BentENR 5 Bing. 185. Gallaway v. HerbertENR 4 T. R. 480. Clayton v. Blakey 2 Sm L. C. 103. Thunder v. BelcherENR 3 East, 449. Hamerton v. Stead 3 B. & Cr. 478, 48......
-
Dease, Executor of Matthew O'Reilly, v William O'Reilly
...1 Swans. 338, note. Ex parte SmythENR 3 Hare, 173. Brown v. AmyotENR 2 Taunt. 148. Hegan v. JohnsonENR 3 Bing. 361. Knight v. BenettENR 5 Bing. 185. Cox v. Bent 5 Ir. Law Rep. 305. Hare v. Cely Cro. Eliz. 143. Wilson v. MackrethENR 3 Burr. 1824. Crosby v. WadsworthENR 6 East, 602. Hanley v.......