Cozens v Brutus
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1972 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
LTSS Print and Supply Services Ltd v Hackney London Borough Council
...scheme. The word "warehouse" is, however, an ordinary English word, and I do not consider that its meaning is a matter of law. (see Brutus -v- Cozens, 1973 A. C. p. 854, per Lord Reid at p. 861). Its meaning may not have been the same in 1973 as in 1844 and may not be the same in England as......
-
R v Ambrose
...to use the provisions of Section 5 for purposes which were clearly not within the intention of Parliament. Only last year in the case of Brutus v. Cozens the House of Lords drew attention to the need to remember what the words of Section 5 say. The words complained of must be insulting and ......
- Bradford (City) Metropolitan District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment
-
R v Arrowsmith
...had to concern themselves with was the charge under the Public Order Act 1936. Having regard to the decision of House of Lords in Brutus v. Cozens (1972) 56 Criminal Appeal Reports 799, it was not surprising that the Justices adjudged that merely handing a leaflet of this kind to a soldier ......
Request a trial to view additional results