Cresswell v Jackson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1860 |
| Date | 01 January 1860 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 175 E.R. 942
QUEEN'S BENCH, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER
Cresswell
and
Jackson
Nottingham Spring Assizes, 1860, coram Pollock, C. B. cresswbll v jackson. (In cross-examination of an attesting witness to a codicil, he denying that it was in his handwriting , other documents admitted by him to be in his writing were allowed to be submitted to the jury for the purpose of comparison of handwriting, under sect 27 of the C L. P Act of 1854.) Issue out of Chancery to try the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1 cases
-
Gilford v Davis
...laid down the jury could not agree, and were discharged. English Reports Citation: 175 E.R. 942 QUEEN'S BENCH, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER175 E.R. 942 QUEEN'S BENCH, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER Gilford and Davis Northampton Spring Assizes, 1860, coram Willes, J gilford v. davis. (The defendan......
2 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1963
...v. R. (1953) A.C. 407. 158 Cooray v. The Queen (1953) 2 W.L.R. 965. 154 Copland v. Davies (1871-72) 5 H.L. 3'58 158 Cresswefl v. Jackson 2 F. & F. 24; 175 E.R. 942. 16 De Bode (Baron) v. R. (1851) 3 H.L. Gas. 449. 183 Dixon Gokpa v. I.G. of Police (1961) All N.L.R. 423. 196 Dunn v. Dunn 2 A......
-
JOBI V. OSHILAJA
...17 HALSBURY'S LAWS 4th Edition 66 para 89] CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT: 1. R. v. Wilcox (1961) All N.L.R. 631. 2. Cresswell v. Jackson 2 F. & F. 24; 175 E.R. 942. 3. Cobbett v. Klminster 4 F. & F. 490; 176 E.R. 659. 4. R. v. Tilley (1961) 1 W.L.R. 1309. 5. R. v. Appea 13 W.A.C.A. 143. D. ......