Crockfords Club Ltd v Mehta
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 31 October 1991 |
| Date | 31 October 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Grosvenor Casinos Ltd v National Bank of Abu Dhabi
...or tokens in exchange for a cheque provided that the cheque met the requirements of subsections (2) and (3): see per Lloyd LJ in Crockfords Club Ltd v Mehta [1992] 1 WLR 355 at 4 One of the ways in which the Club ensured compliance with sections 16(2) and (3) of the Gaming Act was through ......
-
Star City Pty Ltd (fka Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) v Tan Hong Woon
...(refd) Chapman v Franklin (1905) 21 TLR 515 (refd) CHT Ltd v Ward [1965] 2 QB 63; [1963] 3 All ER 835 (refd) Crockfords Club Ltd v Mehta [1992] 1 WLR 355; [1992] 2 All ER 748 (refd) Cumming v Mackie 1973 SLT 242; 1973 SC 278 (refd) G & H Montage GmbH v Irvani [1988] 1 WLR 1285, CA (refd) G ......
-
Grosvenor Casinos Ltd v National Bank of Abu Dhabi [QBD (Comm)]
...(Nigeria) Ltd [1996] CLC 1902. Calico Printers Association v Barclays Bank LtdUNK (1931) 36 Com Cas 71. Crockfords Club Ltd v MehtaWLR [1992] 1 WLR 355. Edgington v FitzmauriceELR (1885) 29 Ch D 459. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994] CLC 918; [1995] 2 AC 145. Koch Marine Inc v d'Ami......
-
Aspinall's Club Ltd v Al-Zayat
...and substituted by the substitute cheque. The dishonour of that cheque led to the revival of the loans: see Crockfords Club v Mehta [1992] 1 W.L.R. 355, Homes v Smith [2000] Lloyd's Reports (Banking) 139. It was not contended (nor could it be) that the cheque was taken in absolute satisfact......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE NEW ORDER 14A (SUMMARY DISPOSAL OF POINTS OF LAW OR CONSTRUCTION) — MORE THAN A CODIFICATION OF EXISTING PRACTICE
...(RSC & SCR). 65 Such as a summons issued pursuant to Ord 18, r 19 to strike out a writ or pleading. See SCP, 1993, vol 1, 14A/1—2/9. 66 [1992] 1 WLR 355. 67 Ibid, at p 357. 68 See Ord 14A, r 1(3) (RSC & SCR). 69 Such as an ‘opposed ex parte application’. 70 See Ord 14A, r 1(4) (RSC & SCR). ......