Crossley v Elworthy
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Equity |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Quah Kay Tee v Ong & Co Pte Ltd
...insolvency, but if insolvency takes place shortly after the execution of the settlement that is enough`: see Crossley v Elworthy (1871) LR 12 Eq 158, per Malins V-C at p 167. No such evidence of solvency was forthcoming in the instant case. Wee Tiong never testified. There was therefore amp......
-
Trustee in Bankruptcy of The Estate of R.P.J. Pelletier v O. Pelletier and Four Others
...(3)Cao, Re, ex p. Dixon, [1994] FCA 1263; Federal Ct., August 12th, 1994, unreported, considered. (4)Crossley v. Ellworthy (1871), L.R. 12 Eq. 158, referred to. (5)DD Growth Premium 2X Fund v. RMF Market Neutral Strategies (Master) Ltd., 2017 (2) CILR 739, considered. (6)Debtor, In re a (Or......
-
O. Pelletier, PDP Corporation and PDP Holdings Inc. v Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of R.P.J. Pelletier
...BCLC 613, considered. (4) Butterworth, Re, ex p. Russell(1882), 19 Ch. D. 588; 51 L.J. Ch. 521, referred to. (5) Crossley v. Elworthy(1871), L.R. 12 Eq. 158, considered. (6) Debtor, In re a, Ex p. the Debtor v. Allen, [1967] 1 Ch. 590, considered. (7) Densham, Re, [1975] 1 W.L.R. 1519; [197......
-
SC SC 62/2005
...for further resort to the Court.20 What was necessary in all cases, however, was 16 17 18 19 20 At 122. At 121. Crossley v Elworthy (1871) LR 12 Eq 158, At 322. Shears v Rogers (1832) 3 B & Ad 363; 110 ER 137. some active election or step by creditors. In a case concerned with s 60, Kareltr......