Crump, Re, ex parte Crump

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1891
Date1891
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 cases
  • Biritz v National Australia Bank Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Winn v Blueprint Instant Printing Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Prendergast v Biddle
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 31 July 1957
    ...claim was for costs and the counterclaim set up was for negligence. An order similar to that in Shepperds' Case was made. Court & Sheen 7 T.L.R. 556., is a case which clearly gives support to the proposition of Mr. Micks that even though the claim be admitted or be clear and unanswerable th......
  • Debtor (No. 20 of 1953), Re. ex parte The Debtor v Scott & O. R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 July 1954
    ...fact contain; and I think that view of the matter is supported by another case, to which Mr Muir Hunter referred us, in 1891, the case of In re. Crump, reported in VIII Bankruptcy Reports, at page 174. That does not bear directly upon the present case. 34 It was of this nature: A judgment h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT