Cuppledick v Sir Philip Terwhit
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1792 |
| Date | 1792 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
John Vanderbergh and James Vanderbergh by their Guardians, Plaintiffs; and George Blake, Defendant
...in the plaint-otherwise between the writ and count, for the writ must be certain. 1 Vent. 0. 2 Lev. 85. Hob. 19, 38. Verdict helps. Hob. 249, 251. 2 Cm 654, vide 2 Vent. 153, contra. But if it can be proved the instructions were right to the cursitor, though he mistake the name, county, or ......
-
Twaites v Shaw
...not guilty pleaded ; and now Mr. Dee moved in arrest of judgment, that the words are not actionable, because of an uncertain signification, Hob. 249, the making false powers do not import forging letters of attorney, for powers is not a proper term for that, and false may signify only GILB.......
-
Bradshaw v Walker
...English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 1081 THE COMMON PLEAS Bradshaw and Walker mich. 17 jao. bradshaw versus walker. Case. Hob. 249. Words, Hitching money. An action of the case was brought for saying, Thou art a filtching fellow, and didst filtch four pounds from me; and after verdict for th......
-
Broad v Piper
...Agatis: if one sue for money due upon a modus, or for an antient composition in the Spiritual Court, there shall not go a prohibition. Hob. 249. 2 lust. 610. 1 Cro. 237, where the Court was divided. East. Entr. . Sid. 263, a prohibition denied in the case of a mortuary; but there the questi......
Request a trial to view additional results