Curry against Stephenson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1793 |
| Date | 01 January 1793 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 87 E.R. 450
COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS, EXCHEQUER.
case 135. cuery against stephenson. Hilary term, 1693, Roll 37. Itidebitalus assumpsit for money due to the plaintiff as administratrix. Ebor. ss.-Memorandum quod die Martis prox. post octab. Sancti Hillarii isto eodem termino coram domino Rege et dominaReginaapud Westm. venerunt Willielmus Curry et Anna uxor ejus administratrix omnium et singulor. bonorum et catallorum jur. et creditorum quse fner. Christoferi Jackson defunct, tempore mortis suaa qui obiit intestat. per Willielmum Blackaller attorn, suum, et protulerunt hie in Curia dictorum domini Regis et dominas Reginse tune ibidem quandam billam suam versua Johannem Stephenson in custorl. mor. &c. de placito transgr. super casum; et suut pleg. de pros, scilicet Johannes Doe et Richardus Roe; quaa quidem billa sequitur in base verba, sa. Ebor. ss. Willielmus Curry et Anne uxor ejus administratrix omnium et singulorum bonorum et catallorum jur. et creditorum qusa fuer. Christoferi Jackson defunct, tempore mortis suse qui obiit intestat. queruntur de Johanne Stephenson in custod. mar. Maresch. domini Regis et [373] dominaa Reginae coram ipsis Rege et Regina existen. pro eo videlicet quod cum prted. Johannes, primo die Augusti anno regni Domini Williel. et Dominaa Marias nutic Regis et Reginae Anglise, &c. quarto, apud Beedall in com. prsed. indebitat. fuisset eisdem Willielmo et Annas, ut administratriei bonorum et catallorum praafat. Christoferi in 251. legalis monetaa Angliaa pro tant. denariorum summa per ipsum Johannem ad usum praafat. Willielmi et Annaa ut administratricis bonorum et catallorum dicti Christoferi ante tempus ill. habit, et recept. et sic indebitat. existen. praad. Johannes in consideratione iride super se assumpsit, et eisdem Willielmo et Annas adtunc et ibidem fideliter promisit quod ipse idem Johannes praad. 251. prafat. Willielmo et Annaa, cum inde postea requisit. esset (a) Lewes v. Hay, Cro. Eliz. 299.-See also Wolf v. Stepney, Cro. Eliz. 864 ; Pelham v. Heminff, Cro. Car. 594 ; and 1 Roll. Abr. 201. (b) Skarning v. Shartwell, Cro. Eliz. 609. But in this case it was held not amendable, because it is part of the judgment, and the act of the Court. But see the 16 & 17 Car. 2, c. 8, and the 4 & 5 Ann. c. 16. (a) Mason v. Fox mid Others, Cro. Jac. 632. Palm. 258. 1 Roll. Abr. 201. (b) 8 Hen. 6, c. 12. (c) Cro. Eliz. 609. (d) Harecourt v. Bishop, Cro...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hodsden against Harridge
...of administration, before which time no cause of action accrued to him. 2 Salk. 421, Gary v. Stephenson. S. C. Garth. 335. Skin. 555. 4 Mod. 372. See Stanford's case, cited Cro. Jac. 61, Saffyd v. Adams.(s) These special replications must conclude with an averment to give the defendant an o......
-
Rhodes v Smethurst, Administratrix of Hobson, Deseased
...reasonable period after probate in which to proceed with an action. In (Jury v. ^tuphensmi (2 Salk. 421 ; S. C. Garth. ,'i:i5 ; Skin. 555; 4 Mod. 372), where C. was indebted to A., who died, and B. received the money, and afterwards the plaintiff's wife took out administration to A., and wi......
-
Murray, Administrator of W. Hope, Deceased, of the Goods left unadministered by James Murray, Deceased, against The East India Company
...Saffyn v. Adams (Cro. Jac. 61), Joliffe v. Pitt (2 Vernon, 694), Gary and Wife v. Stephenson (Salk. 421). Carthew, 335. Skinner, 555, and 4 Mod. 372, S. C.), and Matthews v. Phillips (Salk. 424). The arguments and the authorities cited upon these points, were, however, so fully commented on......