D. B. v W. B
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1935 |
| Year | 1935 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Mattison v R
...Ms. T. Hutchinson, Crown Counsel, for the Crown. Cases cited: (1) Att. Gen. v. Perez, 2010 (1) CILR 188, referred to. (2) B v. B, [1935] P. 80; [1935] All E.R. Rep. 428, dictum of Merriman, P. applied. (3) Barrow v. State, [1998] A.C. 846; [1998] 2 W.L.R. 957; (1998), 52 W.I.R. 493, applied......
-
T v T
...kind of acquiescence by the complaining wife." Reference was then made to the reference by Lord Merriman, President, in D.B. v. W.B., 1935 Probate, 80, to "acts of this sort which cannot have occurred without at least the assent of the wife." Mr Justice Karminski (with whom Mr Justice Colli......
-
R v Dacres
...give himself the traditional warning. Mr. Small cited five English cases commencing with the decision of B. v. B. [1935] All E.R. 428 (1935) p. 80; including Fairman v. Fairman [1949] 1 All E.R. 938 (1949) p. 341 (Divisional Court); Davidson v. Davidson [1953] 1 All E.R. 611(Divisional Cour......
- R v Dacres
1 books & journal articles
-
Laski on Rights and the Problem of Liberal Democratic Theory
...the capitalist a denial of his 79). rights', he argued, `seems to his challengers an armation of their own' (1933, p. 207). He claimed (1935, p. 80) that systems The fundamental problem, as Laski saw it rights must be prepared to meet these chan- (1933, p. 215-216), was that, in a time of ......