D Borough Council v B
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Protection |
| Judgment Date | 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] EWHC 101 (COP) |
| Date | 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
The London Borough of Tower Hamlets v TB (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) (1st Respondent) SA (2nd Respondent)
...under section 12(a) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 where the incapacity to consummate may be on either basis 2. 33 In my own decision of D Borough Council v AB [2011] EWCOP 101 I suggested that the "relevant information" would have to be relatively simple if the level of understanding for sexu......
-
Re M (an Adult) (Capacity: Consent to Sexual Relations)
...to get on; nor whether any child would be likely to be removed from her care." 44 The issue was further analysed by Mostyn J in D Borough Council v B [2011] EWHC 101 (Fam), [2012] Fam 36 in a case concerning an application by a local authority for a declaration that a vulnerable adult with......
-
London Borough of Tower Hamlets v NB
...disrepute.’ 21 The language of this later judgment is, to my mind, rather more prescriptive. The approach was followed by Mostyn J in D Borough Council v AB [2011] EWHC 101 [COP]; [2011] 2 FLR 72, where the following observations were made: ‘[22] At the end, this test is really very simple......
-
Luton Borough Council (Applicant) SB (1st Respondent) RS (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (2nd Respondent)
...persons with disabilities have a right to family life and may be able to care for children. That said, I also agree with Mostyn J in D. Borough Council v B [2011] EWHC 101 (Fam) that the restriction of sexual relationship engages a very profound aspect of an individual's civil liberties and......
Request a trial to view additional results