D Borough Council v B
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] EWHC 101 (COP) |
| Date | 2011 |
| Court | Court of Protection |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Re M (an Adult) (Capacity: Consent to Sexual Relations)
...to get on; nor whether any child would be likely to be removed from her care." 44 The issue was further analysed by Mostyn J in D Borough Council v B [2011] EWHC 101 (Fam), [2012] Fam 36 in a case concerning an application by a local authority for a declaration that a vulnerable adult with......
-
Luton Borough Council (Applicant) SB (1st Respondent) RS (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (2nd Respondent)
...persons with disabilities have a right to family life and may be able to care for children. That said, I also agree with Mostyn J in D. Borough Council v B [2011] EWHC 101 (Fam) that the restriction of sexual relationship engages a very profound aspect of an individual's civil liberties and......
-
B (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v A Local Authority
...for the purpose of this appeal, to chart the history of that development: see generally Re MAB [2006] EWHC 168 (Fam) at [68] ff, and D Borough Council v AB [2011] EWHC 101 48 Cobb J's list of relevant matters, which we have set out in [30] above, is divided into five parts. The OS objects......
-
London Borough of Tower Hamlets v NB
...disrepute.’ 21 The language of this later judgment is, to my mind, rather more prescriptive. The approach was followed by Mostyn J in D Borough Council v AB [2011] EWHC 101 [COP]; [2011] 2 FLR 72, where the following observations were made: ‘[22] At the end, this test is really very simple......
Request a trial to view additional results