Daley v The Queen

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date18 August 1993
Date18 August 1993

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
94 cases
  • Mapp and Bissoon v The State
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 21 July 2016
    ...from the jury unless there is other evidence capable of supporting the identification: R v. Turnbull [1977] QB 224 applied in Daley v. R [1994] 1 AC 117 68 The trial judge's assessment of the quality of the identification evidence was coherent and thorough. Each of the three witnesses' acco......
  • Shivnarine and another v The State
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • Thompson v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... The following cases are referred to in the judgment of their Lordships ... Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation [ 1948 ] 1 K.B. 223 ; [ 1947 ] 2 All E.R. 680 , C.A ... Daley v. The Queen [ 1994 ] 1 A.C. 117 ; [ 1993 ] 3 W.L.R. 666 ; [ 1993 ] 4 All E.R. 86 , P.C ... Ibrahim v. The King [ 1914 ] A.C. 599 , P.C ... Melville v. The King [ 1946 ] A.C. 101 , P.C ... Mitchell v. The Queen [ 1998 ] 2 W.L.R. 839 , P.C ... Reg ... ...
  • R v Brown (Gavaska), Kevin Brown and Troy Matthews
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 6 April 2001
    ...because the evidence has a base which is so slender that it is unreliable and therefore not sufficient to found a conviction: See Wilbert Daley v. The Queen 30 JLR 429 at 436 which applied R v. Turnbull 1977 QB 224. The Turnbull doctrine protects a jury from acting upon the type of evidence......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • THE PERSISTENT PROBLEM OF THE PROSECUTOR’S PRIMA FACIE1 BURDEN
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 December 1997
    ...with other rules of evidence which seem to require a more stringent level of scrutiny at the intermediate stage: Daley v The Queen[1993] 3 WLR 666 (PC Jamaica), Turnbull[1977] QB 224 identification evidence rules. 73 The ideas in this article were first expressed in an address to the Office......