Damper v Bassett
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1901 |
| Date | 1901 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
- Datin Siti Hajar v Murugasu
-
Pugh v Savage
...of the Order. That argument does not appeal to me. 27 Counsel referred us to a case in the Chancery Division before Mr. Justice Joyce, Damper v. Bassett, in 1901 2 Chancery at page 350, as authority to induce us to hold that the Defendant here is limited to a defence under the Prescription ......
-
Bright v Walker
...Gregory, 1890, 25 Q. B. D. 481; Wheaton v. Maple, [1893] 3 Ch. 48. Followed, Hanna v. Pollock, [1900] 2 Ir. R. 664; Damper v. Bassett, [1901] 2 Ch. 350; Kilgour v. Gaddes, [1904] 1 K. B. 457. Not followed, Beggan v. M'Donald, 1878, 2 L. R. Ir. 560. Referred to, Only v. Gardiner, 1838, 4 M. ......
-
Battishill v John Reed and Edward Reed
...Edward Reed S. C. 25 L. J. C. P. 290; 4 W. R. 603. Referred to, Hollins v. Verney, 1884, 13 Q. B. D. 307. Followed, Damper v. Bassett, [1901] 2 Ch. 350. [696] battishill v. john reed and edward eeed. May 28, 1856. [S. C. 25 L. J. C. P. 290; 4 W. E. 603. Eeferred to, Hollins v. Verney, 1884,......
Request a trial to view additional results