Dashwood v Dashwood

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1927
Year1927

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Chin Ah Kwi and Tong Chong Fan v Chin Ah Kwi; Tong Lee Hwa and Another
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Newcrest Mining Ltd v Thornton
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 13 December 2012
    ...AC 507. 20 [1975] AC 507 at 516. 21 Named for Tomlin J who drafted Practice Directions for such orders following his decision in Dashwood v Dashwood [1927] WN 276 that an agreement set out in a schedule to a consent order staying an action on the terms of the agreement was not supportive of......
  • Newcrest Mining Ltd v Thornton
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 13 December 2012
    ...AC 507. 20 [1975] AC 507 at 516. 21 Named for Tomlin J who drafted Practice Directions for such orders following his decision in Dashwood v Dashwood [1927] WN 276 that an agreement set out in a schedule to a consent order staying an action on the terms of the agreement was not supportive of......
  • Community Care North East v Durham County Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 29 April 2010
    ...order was in the form of a Tomlin Order, as suggested by Tomlin J in Practice Note [1927] WN 290, following the decision in Dashwood v Dashwood (1927) 71 SJ 911. The March 2009 Order referred to the fact that the parties had agreed terms attached to the order, referred to as “the terms” and......
  • Get Started for Free