David Crawford v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 1999 SCCR 674 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
William Beck V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...to sightings of the appellant on the bus between 5.00pm and 6.00pm. This inaccuracy amounted to a misdirection (Crawford v HM Advocate 1999 SCCR 674, Lord Bonomy at 678; Cairns v HM Advocate 1999 SCCR 552, LJG (Rodger) at 557). [32] The fifth ground of appeal related to the directions on ma......
-
Abdelbaset Al Megrahi V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...JC 251 Campbell v HM AdvocateSC 1998 JC 130 Clarke v Edinburgh and District Tramways Company Ltd1919 SC (HL)35 Crawford v HM AdvocateUNK 1999 SCCR 674 Donaldson v ValentineUNK 1996 SCCR 374 Donnelly v HM AdvocateUNK 2000 SCCR 861 Duncan v WilsonSC 1940 SC 221 Dunn v Dunn's TrusteesSC 1930 S......
-
Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...misdirection of the jury by the judge in regard to a matter of law or a matter of fact (as to the latter, see e.g. Crawford v HM Advocate 1999 SCCR 674). The basis for such an appeal requires to be found in the charge to the jury, read along with their verdict. In the case of the trial cour......
-
Kirk Leggatt V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...the conviction of the appellant on both charges. Findlay's evidence was not crucial (cp Shepherd v HM Adv 1997 SLT 525; Crawford v HM Adv 1999 SCCR 674; Cairns v HM Adv, supra). [14]In any event, there was a self-contained case against the appellant for his own direct responsibility for the......