David (J. E.) v S. P. A. De Silva

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1934
Date1934
Year1934
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Chappell & Company Ltd v Nestlé Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 March 1958
    ...in support of this submission, including Walsh v. secretary of state for India, reported in 10 House of Lords Cases, at page 386, David v. da Silva, reported in 1934 Appeal Case B, at page 114 and, to show that the principle was applied more rigidly if penal consequences were involved, L.C.......
  • The Queen v Fung Chi Wood
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 7 January 1991
    ...a strict and narrow interpretation Mr Lee prays in aid several authorities dealing with statutory ambiguity, including David v. de Silva [1934] AC 106, East Coast Amusement v. British Transport Board [1965) AC 58 and R v. Clarke [1985] A.C. 47. I see no ambiguity in this section and I do no......
  • Re Robinson's
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 20 March 1980
    ...Glover QC and M Karthigesu (Turner Peacock) for the respondent. Attorney General v Horner (1884) 14 QBD 245 (refd) David v De Silva [1934] AC 106 (refd) Land Acquisition Act (Cap 272, 1970 Rev Ed) ss 5 (1), 33 (1) (consd); ss 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 (1), 10 (2), 13, 16, 19, 48 (1) Land–Compuls......
  • Barisan Arena Sdn. Bhd. v Perbadanan Prima Malaysia, 07-10-2019
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 7 October 2019
    ...there is any ambiguity, the construction which is in favour of the freedom of the individual should be adopted (JE David v SPA De Silva [1934] AC 106 and O'Connor Isaacs [1956] 2 QB 288).” (emphasis added). 13. Based on UMBC’s Case, I resolve the conflict between ss 3(3) and 73(b) PR1MA in ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Interpretation Of Statutes
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 12 Interpretation Of Statutes
    • 3 July 2016
    ...that if there is any ambiguity the construction which is in favour of the freedom of the individual should be adopted (David v. De Silva (1934) A.C.106).” - Per Oguntade, J.C.A. in Okara & Ors. v. Ndili Suit No. CA/E/ 87/88; (1989) 4 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 118) 700 at 711. 151 Statute requiring mini......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT