Davies v Owen (Thomas) and Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1919 |
| Date | 1919 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
John Summers & Sons Ltd v Frost
...18, 19, and 22 and no doubt in many other sections. 5 Thirdly, it was decided as long ago as 1919 in Davies v. Thomas Owen & Co. Ltd. [1919] 2 K.B. 39) that the obligation imposed by the comparable section 10 of the Factories Act, 1901, was absolute and that, if the result of a machine bein......
-
Close v Steel Company of Wales Ltd
...377) which could not be used at all if they had to be fenced by means of a fixed guard (as Salter, J. had pointed out in Davies v. Thomas Owen & Company Limited [1919] 2 K.B. 39 at p. 41). So the proviso was inserted to enable the occupier to provide an automatic guard which would come int......
-
Reid (Joseph) v Mobile Welding and Engineering Works Ltd and Newton Rodney
...is dangerous, it must be fenced and that this is an absolute duty. ( John Summers & Sons, Ltd. v Frost [1955] 1AII ER 870; Davies v Thomas Owen & Company, Limited[1919] 2 K.B. 39 ). A review of the cases on the subject of the danger associated with machines and the need to fence leads, ine......
-
Chalmers v Speedwell Wire Company
...at p. 315; Hindle v. BirtwistleELR, [1897] 1 Q. B. 192; Blenkinsop v. OgdenELR, [1898] 1 Q. B. 783; Davies v. Thomas Owen & Co.ELR, [1919] 2 K. B. 39; Lewis v. DenyeELR,[1940] A. C. 921; Sowter v. Steel Barrel Co.UNK, (1936) 154 L. T. 4 Factory and Workshop Act, 1901, (1 Edw. VII, cap. 22),......
Request a trial to view additional results