Dawson v Great Northern and City Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1905
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
  • Body Corporate 366567 v Auckland Council
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • January 30, 2024
    ...both. Body Corporate 326421 v Auckland Council [2015] NZHC 862 [Nautilus] at [272]. See also Dawson v Great Northern & City Railway Co [1905] 1 KB 260 at [268]; and Cole-Hamilton v Boyd [1963] S.C (H.L.) 1 at Compliance with s 50 of the Property Law Act 2007 is not in issue. Notwithstanding......
  • SPV Osus Ltd v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • July 31, 2018
    ...the reverse. However, the defendants cite the observations of Stirling L.J. in Dawson v. Great Northern and City Railway Co. [1905] 1 K.B. 260 at pp. 270 to 271, to the effect that the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 (the equivalent of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 187......
  • Decision Nº ACQ 452 2009. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 06-10-2015
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
    • October 6, 2015
    ...Afzal v Rochdale MBC [1980] 1 EGLR 157 Tamplins Brewery Ltd v Brighton CBC (1971) 22 P&CR 746 Dawson v Great Northern & City Railway Co [1905] 1 KB 260 Fishenden v Higgs and Hill Ltd [1935] 153 LT 128 Scott v Scott [2006] FamCA 1379 Trocette Property Co v Greater London Council [1974] 28 P&......
  • Camdex International Ltd v Bank of Zambia
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • April 3, 1996
    ...kind or other was assigned, and there was attached, as incidental to it, a right to bring an action: see Dawson v GN and C Railway Co [1905] 1 KB 260, 270–272 and Ellis v Torrington; or an undisputed debt was assigned, because this was regarded as a piece of property: see Fitzroy v Cave. Ap......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • The Trendtex Principle in Australian Law: Context and Recent Developments
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 40-2, September 2016
    • September 1, 2016
    ...JA); Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Limited v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 386 [258] (Kirby J). 44(1829) 2 Moo & P 779. 45Ibid, 787. 46[1905] 1 KB 260. 47Ibid., 271. 48[1973] VR 161. 49Ibid., 166-167; See also Sartori v BM2008 Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1160 [57] (Mckerracher J); Daine Skapin......
  • Litigation Funding, Assignment of Actions and Access to Justice: SPV Osus v HSBC [2018] IESC 44
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 18-2019, January 2019
    • January 1, 2019
    ...J). 31 ibid [37]. 32 ibid [4.1] (Clarke CJ). 33 Williams v Protheroe (1829) 3 Y&J 129; Dawson v Great Northern and City Railway Co [1905] 1 KB 260; Ellis v Torrington [1920] 1 KB 399. In those cases, causes of action which were assigned pursuant to transfers of property were upheld. See als......
  • BOOK DEBT FINANCING1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1993, December 1993
    • December 1, 1993
    ...sale of a reversionary interest (Torkington v Magee[1902] 2 K.B. 427), rights to claim indefinite sums of money (Dawson v G N & City Ry[1905] 1 K B 260) and the right to a salary under a contract of service (Horwood v Millar’s Timber and Trading Co Ltd[1917] 1 K B 305. On the other hand, th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT