Deakins v kookings
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1994 |
| Year | 1994 |
| Court | County Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Gregory v Turner; R (on the application of Morris) v North Somerset Council
...he referred to cases cited in Gale on Easements ( Carr Securities v Dick Maitland Associates [1986] 1 WLR 922; Deakins v Hookings [1994] 1 EGLR 190) as showing that, in that context, the court could take account of loss of amenity generally, and the defendant's expected profit. There is, h......
- R (M) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
-
Decision Nº ACQ 452 2009. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 06-10-2015
...Colonial Stores Ltd [1904] AC 179 Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates [1986] Ch 922 Ough v King [1967] 1 WLR 1547 Deakins v Hookings [1994] 1 EGLR 190 Regan v Paul (2006) EWHC 1941 Hortons Estate Ltd v James Beattie [1927] 1 Ch 75 Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Co Ltd [2005] ......
- Regan v Paul Properties Ltd and Others
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Particular Easements and Examples of Analogous Remedies of Relevance to Development
...Dick McNeil Associates Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 922; Moore v Hall (1878) 3 QBD 178 at 182. 42 Ough v King [1967] 1 WLR 1547; Deakins v Hookings [1994] 14 EG 133, where even though the dominant owner had failed to obtain an interlocutory injunction, the court still granted a mandatory injunction bec......