Decision Nº O/099/22 from Intellectual Property Office - (Trade market), 7 February 2022
Judge | Mr G Salthouse |
Registration Number | UK00003364805, UK00003364817 |
Date | 07 February 2022 |
Court | Intellectual Property Office (United Kingdom) |
Administrative Decision Number | O/099/22 |
1
O-099-22
SUPPLEMENTARY DECISION
TRADE MARKS ACT 1994
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION No. 3364817
BY CAMBRIDGE QUANTUM COMPUTING LIMITED
TO REGISTER IN CLASSES 9, 36 & 42
THE TRADE MARK
AND IN THE MATTER OF OPPOSITION THERETO UNDER No. 416098
BY THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
AND IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION No. 3364805
BY CAMBRIDGE QUANTUM COMPUTING LIMITED
TO REGISTER IN CLASS 36
THE TRADE MARK
CAMBRIDGE QUANTUM COMPUTING
AND IN THE MATTER OF OPPOSITION THERETO UNDER No. 416143
BY THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
BACKGROUND
1) In my decision, issued on 21 December 2021, I set out some of the issues I had with the handling
of the case by the opponent and it was clear that the applicant also had criticisms regarding the
pleadings, evidence and overall handling of the case. As part of their skeleton arguments the
applicant’s Trade Mark Attorney stated:
“Costs
65.We request an order that UOC pay costs above the scale in light of their abusive behaviour in
the following ways:
To continue reading
Request your trial