Decision Nº LC-2022-213. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 16-02-2023 , [2023] UKUT 45 (LC)

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeMartin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President
Neutral Citation[2023] UKUT 45 (LC)
Date16 February 2023
CourtUpper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
Judgement NumberLC-2022-213
UPPER TRIBUNAL (LANDS CHAMBER)
UT Neutral citation number: [2023] UKUT 45 (LC) UTLC No: LC-2022-213
Royal Courts of Justice, Strand,
London WC2A 2LL
16 February 2023
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST TIER TRIBUNAL
(PROPERTY CHAMBER)
LANDLORD AND TENANT SERVICE CHARGES landlord given discretion to apportion
charges amongst leaseholders who “have the use of” certain services whether leaseholder
liable to contribute to cost of replacing a lift which he did not use appeal dismissed
BETWEEN:
BRUCE ANTHONY REEKIE Appellant
-and-
OAKWOOD COURT RESIDENTS
ASSOCIATION LIMITED
Respondent
Re: Flat 5, Oakwood Court,
11 Bolsover Road,
Eastbourne
Martin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President
Hearing date: 14 February 2023
Mr Bruce Reekie, the appellant, represented himself
Mr Jonathan Wragg, instructed by PDC Law, solicitors, for the respondent
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 firm's commentaries
  • Service Charge (Lift)
    • Jersey
    • Mondaq Jersey
    • May 18, 2023
    ...is he still required to contribute towards its maintenance? A: In short, 'yes'. In Reekie v Oakwood Court Residents Association [2023] UKUT 45 (LC) the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (UT) was asked to determine whether a long leaseholder was obliged by the terms of his lease to contribute t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT