Decision Nº LC-2022-213. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 16-02-2023 , [2023] UKUT 45 (LC)
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judge | Martin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President |
Neutral Citation | [2023] UKUT 45 (LC) |
Date | 16 February 2023 |
Court | Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) |
Judgement Number | LC-2022-213 |
UPPER TRIBUNAL (LANDS CHAMBER)
UT Neutral citation number: [2023] UKUT 45 (LC) UTLC No: LC-2022-213
Royal Courts of Justice, Strand,
London WC2A 2LL
16 February 2023
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST TIER TRIBUNAL
(PROPERTY CHAMBER)
LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES – landlord given discretion to apportion
charges amongst leaseholders who “have the use of” certain services – whether leaseholder
liable to contribute to cost of replacing a lift which he did not use – appeal dismissed
BETWEEN:
BRUCE ANTHONY REEKIE Appellant
-and-
OAKWOOD COURT RESIDENTS
ASSOCIATION LIMITED
Respondent
Re: Flat 5, Oakwood Court,
11 Bolsover Road,
Eastbourne
Martin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President
Hearing date: 14 February 2023
Mr Bruce Reekie, the appellant, represented himself
Mr Jonathan Wragg, instructed by PDC Law, solicitors, for the respondent
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
To continue reading
Request your trial1 firm's commentaries
-
Service Charge (Lift)
...is he still required to contribute towards its maintenance? A: In short, 'yes'. In Reekie v Oakwood Court Residents Association [2023] UKUT 45 (LC) the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (UT) was asked to determine whether a long leaseholder was obliged by the terms of his lease to contribute t......