Dee Conservancy Board v McConnell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 23 February 1928 |
| Date | 23 February 1928 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Stonedale No 1 (Owners) v Manchester Ship Canal Company
...it may have, a common law right to recover against the owners as damages the reasonable cost of removing the obstruction: see Dee Conservancy Board v. McConnell [1928] 2 K.B. 159. This decision was not called to the attention of Mr. Justice Langton when he heard the case of The " Millie" a......
-
The Putbus
...the owners, as damages, the reasonable cost of the work, see The Elle ( 1915 P. 111); and ( Dee Conservancy Board and Others v. McConnell 1928 2 K.B. 159). 17 The type of liability in Dutch law is, therefore, the same as in English law. Is it a type to which a limit is set by section 503, a......
- Jan de Nul (UK) Ltd v NV Royale Belge
-
Liverpool (The) (No. 2)
... ... R.H. Bransbury, Liverpool) appeared on behalf of the Appellants the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board (Respondents to cross-appeal of Messrs. Waltons' Clients.) ... Mr. BOSTACE W. ROSKILL, Q.C. and Mr ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results