Dee Conservancy Board v McConnell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date23 February 1928
Date23 February 1928
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Stonedale No 1 (Owners) v Manchester Ship Canal Company
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 June 1955 may have, a common law right to recover against the owners as damages the reasonable cost of removing the obstruction: see Dee Conservancy Board v. McConnell [1928] 2 K.B. 159. This decision was not called to the attention of Mr. Justice Langton when he heard the case of The " Millie" a......
  • The Putbus
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 March 1969
    ...the owners, as damages, the reasonable cost of the work, see The Elle ( 1915 P. 111); and ( Dee Conservancy Board and Others v. McConnell 1928 2 K.B. 159). 17 The type of liability in Dutch law is, therefore, the same as in English law. Is it a type to which a limit is set by section 503, a......
  • Jan de Nul (UK) Ltd v NV Royale Belge
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Liverpool (The) (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 July 1960
    ... ... R.H. Bransbury, Liverpool) appeared on behalf of the Appellants the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board (Respondents to cross-appeal of Messrs. Waltons' Clients.) ... Mr. BOSTACE W. ROSKILL, Q.C. and Mr ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT