Deen v Davies
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1935 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Gibb v Comerford
...reasonable care to prevent them from causing damage). Heath's Garage Ltd. v. HodgesELR [1916] 2 K. B. 370, followed; Deen v. DaviesELR [1935] 2 K. B. 282, and Pitcher v. MartinUNK[1937] 3 All E. R. 918, distinguished. A dog, alleged to be the property of the defendant, ran from the defendan......
-
Gomberg v Smith
...the Defendant deliberately brought the dog on to the highway, he had a duty to take reasonable care to control it while it was there. In Dean v. Davies, 1935 2 King's Bench, 282, it was held that a person who brings an animal on to the highway must take reasonable care to prevent it from d......
-
Wormald v Cole
...been only heedless or clumsy. But I take this to be an immaterial distinction. As was said by Lord justice Romer (as he then was) in Deen v. Davies, it would be strange if the owner of a horse which strays on the highway were to be free of liability if his horse kicked a passenger, but liab......
-
Brackenborough v Spalding Urban District Council
...J., Willes J., Keating J., who formed the Court in Cox v. Burbidge, 13 C.B.N.S. 430. Its limits are still uncertain. Romer L.J., in Deen v. Davies, 1935, 2 K.B. 282, regarded it as applying to animals depastured on land adjoining a highway. The Irish Court of Appeal in Howard v. Bergin, O'......
Request a trial to view additional results