Denney, Gasquet and Metcalfe v Conklin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1913 |
| Year | 1913 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
- Goodridge v Macquarie Bank Ltd
-
Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank International), Singapore Branch v Motorola Electronics Pte Ltd
...James Talcott, Ltd., immediately. On the general point of adequacy of notice, Mackinnon LJ quoted Denney, Gasquet & Metcalfe v Conklin [1913] 3 KB 177 (at 180): The language is immaterial if the meaning is plain, but that plain meaning must be that the debt and the right to receive it have ......
- Kwong Hing Realty Sdn Bhd v Malaysia Building Society Bhd (American International Assurance Company Ltd, Third party)
-
Van Lynn Developments Ltd v Pelias Construction Company Ltd (formerly Jason Construction Company Ltd)
...and I would dismiss this appeal. LORD JUSTICE DAVIES 16 I agree, and would only add some observations about the case of Denny. Gasquet. and Matoalfe v. Conklin to which my Lord has already referred. In the first place, it is to my mind clear that the document relied upon there as a notice o......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The impact of the Personal Property Securities Act on assignments of accounts.
...511, 517 (Williams and Smith JJ). (82) Smith v Owners of the SS Zigurds [1934] AC 209, 212-13 (Lord Atkin). (83) See Denney v Conklin [1913] 3 KB 177, 180 (Aitken The letter in question gives express notice to the defendant of the deed of arrangement, which as I have said is an absolute ass......