Dent v Dent

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1996
Year1996
Date1996
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Pitt and Another v Holt and Another Futter and Another v Futter and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • May 9, 2013
    ...generally agreed that "effect" must mean legal effect (in the sense of the legal character or nature of a transaction). In Dent v Dent [1996] 1 WLR 683, 693 the deputy judge (David Young QC) understood it as "the purpose or object" of a transaction. Several other first-instance judges have ......
  • HI-TECH Investment Limited v World Aviation Systems (australia) Pty
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • December 16, 2008
    ...areas courts retained the power to set aside a document or rectify it. [54] Gibbon v Mitchell [1990] 1 WLR 1304, 1307 and Dent v Dent [1996] 1 WLR 683 provided such examples, as did Sieff v Fox [2005] 3 ALL ER 693. In Gibbon v Mitchell relief was granted in respect of a voluntary and indeed......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT