Det v Executors que plede pleinement administer, & trove fuit que ils avoint

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1664
Year1664
Date01 January 1664
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 338

DEL COMMON-BANK

Det
and
ers Executors que plede pleinement administer, & trove fuit que ils avoint

[32] LXXVII. Det vers Executors que plede pleinement administer, & trove fuit que ils avoint assets, apres que fieri facias issist al Vicount queux retunie que ils nont rein deins mesnae la County, & ceo fuifc terms bone returne ; car poit estre que les Jurors trove cest assets in un auter County come ils bien poient fils voile prender notice de ceo, & uncore lour verdit ne Her le Vicount. P. 7 E. 6.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Re McBain
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 April 2002
    ...are two possible sources of jurisdiction: ss 75(v) and 76(i) of the Constitution. Reliance on s 76(i), in turn, directs attention to ss 30(a) and 32 of the Judiciary Act. In each case, it is necessary to identify the matter in which the Court is said to have jurisdiction. 19 Since no jurisd......
  • Tuohy v Courtney
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 26 July 1994
    ...of 3 years and five months at 11% amounting to £3,195. I allow interest at 8% from the 23rd of January 1989 to date a period of 3 years and 32 weeks and this comes to £2,458. The total of these three sums therefore £8,500 £3,195 and £2,458 come to £14,153. 53 In addition the Plaintiff would......
  • Q v Minister for Health & Children
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 28 March 2007
    ...according to the Inland Revenue affidavit, is registered on Folio -- County -- and Folio -- County -- and comprises 31 acres, 2 roods and 32 perches. It was valued on the Inland Revenue affidavit as at the Testator's death at IR£280,000. The Testator bought Whiteacre in the mid-1960s and he......
  • The Bank of Nova Scotia v Hogan
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1997
    ...the deeds to the lands specified at numbers 1 and 2 in the schedule to the order (the premises known as numbers 77 Roebuck Downs, Dublin 14, and 32 Brookevale Downs, Rathfarnham, Dublin 14) on Mr Hogan's interest on the said lands and premises and, secondly, by the equitable mortgage create......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT