En dett port per Eliz. Taw Execut de J. Taw, Company v William Bury, le Case fuit [DEL COMMON-BANK]
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Year | 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation:123 E.R. 322
DEL COMMON-BANK
En dett port per Eliz. Taw Execut de J. Taw
&c.
and
ers William Bury, le Case fuit
VIII. En dett port per Eliz. Taw Execut de J. Taw, &c. vers William Bury, le Case fuit, le dit William,, a Excester in le Counte &c. cause escript d'eatre escry & enseale 1 ANDERSON, 1 823 & ceo la delyver a Vincent Calmady a delyver al John Taw come son fait; apres quel delyvery le dit Vincent offer a delyver ceo al dit John Taw come le fait le dit...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
419 cases
-
Real Estate Board v Jennifer Messado & Company
...accounts and inquiries are to be borne by KES Development Co. Ltd (in Liquidation) to be taxed if not agreed. It is ordered that the 3 rd and 4 th Defendants do pay such sums, if any, as may be found to be due upon the taking of such accounts and the making of such inquiries including inter......
-
C.O. Williams Construction (ST. Lucia) Ltd Applicant/Defendant v Inter-Island Dredging Company Ltd Respondent/Claimant [ECSC]
...in the Rules for applications for extension of time falling outside of the purview of CPR 26.7(2) and (3), CPR 26.8, and CPR 27.8(3) and (4), does not mean that there is no established criteria for determining applications for extension of time. 8. The Court has a very broad discretionary p......
-
[1] Port Zante Merchants Association [2] Sol E Mar [3] Captain Jack [4] Square Duty Free [5] Diamond Island [6] Duty Free Plaza Applicants/Defendants v [1] Alex Decosta [2] Urban Development Corporation [3] Ministry of Tourism [4] Attorney General of St. Christopher and Nevis Respondents/Defendants [ECSC]
...2013, one for the 2nd respondent sworn to by Mr. Keith Phillip Operations Manager of the Urban Development Council, and one for the 3rd and 4th respondents sworn to by Ms. Patricia Martin, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Tourism. There was no affidavit filed on behalf of the 1st Resp......
-
Djl v Central Authority
...power in s 111B of the Act; (3) the unconstitutionality of the Regulations in so far as they applied to a child ‘as an Australian citizen’; and (4) that the order of the primary judge was ‘spent’. 61 The application was listed before the Chief Justice of the Family Court, Nicholson CJ84, wh......
Get Started for Free