En dett port per Eliz. Taw Execut de J. Taw, Company v William Bury, le Case fuit [DEL COMMON-BANK]
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Year | 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 322
DEL COMMON-BANK
En dett port per Eliz. Taw Execut de J. Taw
&c.
and
ers William Bury, le Case fuit
VIII. En dett port per Eliz. Taw Execut de J. Taw, &c. vers William Bury, le Case fuit, le dit William,, a Excester in le Counte &c. cause escript d'eatre escry & enseale 1 ANDERSON, 1 823 & ceo la delyver a Vincent Calmady a delyver al John Taw come son fait; apres quel delyvery le dit Vincent offer a delyver ceo al dit John Taw come le fait le dit William...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
294 cases
-
Real Estate Board v Jennifer Messado & Company
...accounts and inquiries are to be borne by KES Development Co. Ltd (in Liquidation) to be taxed if not agreed. It is ordered that the 3 rd and 4 th Defendants do pay such sums, if any, as may be found to be due upon the taking of such accounts and the making of such inquiries including inter......
-
C.O. Williams Construction (ST. Lucia) Ltd Applicant/Defendant v Inter-Island Dredging Company Ltd Respondent/Claimant [ECSC]
...in the Rules for applications for extension of time falling outside of the purview of CPR 26.7(2) and (3), CPR 26.8, and CPR 27.8(3) and (4), does not mean that there is no established criteria for determining applications for extension of time. 8. The Court has a very broad discretionary p......
-
Ormiston Arnold Boyea Hudson Willliams Claimants v Eastern Caribbean Flour Mills Ltd Defendant [ECSC]
...to be admissible. 56 In support of his submissions Learned Queen's Counsel referred the Court to CPR 2000 Part 32.7 (2), section 47 ( 1) and (4) of the Evidence Act Cap 158 and the case ofR v Atedom (1983) 1 AER p.364. 57 In response Learned Queen's Counsel for the Defendant Mr. Gale submit......
-
Commissioner of Taxation v Citylink Melbourne Ltd
...Link Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 135 FCR 356 at 361ff. 89 Section 14(1) of the Melbourne City Link Act 1995 (Vic). 90 Sections 1 and 4 of the Melbourne City Link Act 1995 91 (2004) 135 FCR 356 at 361 [11]. 92 Clause 3.1(a)(i) of the Concession Deed. 93 City Link Melbourne Ltd v Co......
Get Started for Free
