Dickinson v NAL Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2017] EWHC 28 (Ch)
Date2017
Year2017
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Henry George Dickinson v Nal Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 3, 2019
    ...ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION His Honour Judge David Cooke (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) [2017] EWHC 28 (Ch) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Mr Stephen Davies QC (instructed by Francis Wilks & Jones) for the Mr James Barker (instructed ......
  • Neil Leslie Humphrey v Paul Craig Bennett
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • November 29, 2023
    ... ... 89 So, for example, in Dickinson v NAL Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd [2020] 2 BCLC 120 , this court held that relief under ... ...
  • Northampton Borough Council v Anthony Michael Cardoza
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • January 24, 2019
    ...because the company has suffered no loss. Mr Zaman also referred to Dickinson v NAL Realisations (Staffordshire) Limited and others [2017] EWHC 28 (Ch), which he described as a case where (a) the company was insolvent or on the verge of insolvency, (b) the director had extracted £2.5million......
  • Anthony Davidson and Andrew McTear (acting as Joint Liquidators of Kieran Looney & Company Ltd) v Kieran Joseph Looney
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • February 2, 2023
    ...I was not referred to any authority on this issue. As to whether Mr Looney acted reasonably in all the circumstances, in Dickinson v NAL Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd [2017] EWHC 28 (Ch) it was stated at [76] that where a director of a company had not given consideration at all to the i......
2 firm's commentaries
  • Directors' dealings and company assets
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • April 13, 2017
    ...is paying for it) that determines whether shareholder approval is necessary. Dickinson v. NAL Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd [2017] EWHC 28 (Ch) Richard BarhamCandice ChapmanDavid...
  • 2017 Summer review: M&A legal and market developments
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • July 29, 2017
    ...director paid. An appeal hearing is awaited in relation to the judgment. (Dickinson v NAL Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd. and others [2017] EWHC 28 (Ch)) Key …… Full board consideration of undervalue transactions: Board deliberations to consider proposed transactions at less than market v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT