Digby v East Cambridgeshire District Council
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] UKEAT 0522_06_3011 |
| Date | 2006 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Dr J Al-Tarkait v Kuwait Oil Company (KSC): 2206236/2016
...have been upheld. I was referred in particular to Krelle v. Ransom (UKEAT/0568/05); Digby v. East Cambridgeshire District Council [2007] IRLR 585; and McBride (above). In Krelle the tribunal had refused to allow the claimant to call his wife to give evidence on matters which it regarded as ......
-
Dr G Kalu v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitlals NHS Trust and Others
...Langstaff J in Krelle v Ransom (unreported) 27 January 2006, EAT, adopted by HHJ Clark in Digby v East Cambridgeshire District Council [2007] IRLR 585 was correct, where he said “A Tribunal has a discretion, in accordance with the overriding objective, to exclude relevant evidence which is ......
-
Connolly vs Caterpillar (NI) Ltd
...to when exercising any power given under, or interpreting these Regulations and Rules. In Digby v East Cambridgeshire District Council [2007] IRLR 585, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a tribunal, in the interests of modern day case-management, has a discretion to exclude relevant e......
-
Hooker vs Ards and North Down Borough,Graeme Bannister
...about the case. Preliminary hearings can also cause unnecessary costs and delays.” In Digby v East Cambridgeshire District Council [2007] IRLR 585, paragraph 12 it was confirmed the tribunal has a discretion, which must be exercised judicially, in accordance with the overriding objective “t......
Request a trial to view additional results